
We're a little more than a week away from likely finding out what all the Windows Phone Seven (or Windows Mobile 7, or Seven, or whatever) is all about. And that means it's time for more rumors to come crawling out of the woodwork.
After the break, let's tackle the latest batch that was seeded to a couple of sites (Mobile Tech World and PPCGeeks) and what we think of them.
Before we begin: We're going to answer these rumors as if they're true, but honestly we have no idea if they are or not. Obviously we still don't have any official word as to what's ahead for Mobile World Congress, and we still don't really know how these rumors might or might not fit in with the other big ones we've heard.
Rumor: Windows Phone Seven will debut at Mobile World Congress. But it will only be the user interface. No hardware, and no in-depth demos.
Hardly a shocker there, as we've been telling you that for a very long time, and it's mostly been confirmed by Microsoft execs. Don't be too worried about not getting overly in depth. That'll come.
Rumor: The new UI, codenamed "Metro," is similar to that of the Zune HD. It will have a completely new start screen.
Again, that surprises anybody? You know what else has a UI that's similar to the Zune HD? Windows Mobile 6.5. That said, the two feel very different. (You can thank the Zune HD's Snapdragon processor and capacitive screen for that, though the HTC HD2 closes the gap nicely.)
Oh, and if this really turns out to be true, just remember: I told you so.
Rumor: No Flash support, but Silverlight's on board. And there will be no fewer than four development sessions at Microsoft's MIX10 conference in March.
As far as the MIX10 conference goes, we've known since November that they'll be talking the latest version of Windows Mobile there. And "Windows Phone Application and Game Development" is peppered throughout the session list. So, yeah, it's on the agenda.
As for Silverlight, we've known for quite some time that it's going to play a pretty big part in WP/WM 7. But what I keep thinking back to is a concept video we saw last year. It likely has less to do with what we'll see unveiled as it does what's possible. And that's exciting.
And as for Flash: It's time to get over it. For reals.
Rumor: Apps can only be loaded through the Marketplace, and there's no multitasking as we now know it. Apps will pause in the background, however, and there will be push notifications.
The word "Multitasking" gets thrown around a lot these days. What you really want is the ability to stop what you're doing, go do something else, and then come back to the original task, right where you left off. So what if only one app is "running" at a time? As long as you don't lose your place, no biggie.
No sideloading? Again, it's a brave new world out there, folks. But never underestimate the, shall we say, "enthusiast" community to find ways around things.
Rumor: There won't be any backward NETCF compatibility.
I've said it before, and I'm sure I'll have to say it again: It's likely time to forget what you know about Windows Mobile, folks. Don't think of this as a new version. Think of this as a new platform.
Will things be ported? Will there be emulators? Maybe. But starting fresh isn't a bad thing. When you buy a new car, you lose the work and money you put into the last one. But do you look back?
Rumor: Full Zune integration. Syncing will be done through the Zune desktop software. Full Xbox integration.
Somebody want to tell us what "Zune integration" is? That's another one of those phrases that's been thrown around without anyone really knowing what it means. If it has a Zune-like UI or media player, is that "Zune integration?" If it works through the Zune Marketplace or desktop software, is that "Zune integration?"
Oh, and good riddance, Windows Mobile Device Center.
Rumor: No OEM interfaces. As in, no Sense UI, no Mobile Shell, etc.
Again, surprised? It's a paradigm shift for Microsoft, and one that's going to make a lot of people unhappy. We're all going to have to get over it. Sorry.
OK, everybody. That's it. Is this the future of Windows Mobile? Will there be several tracks? One week to go, and then we'll find out … something. Stay tuned.
Overview: This article provides two options of how to view files from MOSS 2007 (Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007) in a Windows Explorer type view on Vista Operating Systems.
Symptoms: Users are use to accessing MOSS 2007 Explorer views from Internet Explorer for Windows Explorer type functionality such as drag and drop of files. When the users system is upgraded to Microsoft Vista, typical avenues of accessing Windows Explorer views fail.
Cause: This is a known issue that the industry is experiencing; Microsoft has yet to release a fix as of July 10, 2009.
Resolution: Microsoft Vista provides a better feature set for connecting to Web Folders than previously available in Windows XP. Users should leverage either the “Mapped Drives” or “Web Folders” functionality of Vista to access Windows Explorer type functionality of MOSS 2007 folders.
Options: The two options for users are:
INSTRUCTIONS
Option 1: How to Create Mapped Drive
INSTRUCTIONS
Option 2: How to Create a Web Folder

Remember that the iPad is supposed to give you the full internet experience but it's running the same OS that the iPod Touch does which has NO FLASH. This really bums me out because Apple finally came in at a price point we all can respect ($499). Other than the flash gripe the only other one I have is background apps but I can live with that. A 9.8 inch screen is small but some of you guys use sub 10" laptops to browse the web… right??


There is an advertisement on our left sidebar for a weightloss program that is worth testing. Basically, you get unrestricted eating for five consecutive hours then water after that. For example not eating before noon and not eating after dinner.
The Fast-5 Diet is a way of eating that facilitates weight loss. Exercise is encouraged but not required.
There’s no membership fee or hidden cost.
There is no food off limits.
No special foods are required.
Calorie counting is not required.
The Fast-5 diet is not just a weight-loss diet — it is a comfortable way to live to maintain a healthy weight indefinitely.
The Fast-5 diet is a form of intermittent fasting with a daily short fasting period (19 hours, including sleeping) followed by an unrestricted eating window of 5 hours.
During the five consecutive hours (the “eating window”), eat as much as you’re hungry for, and eat what you want to eat. As long as you keep at least a nineteen-hour fast daily and eat within five or fewer consecutive hours, you’re within the guidelines of the Fast-5 program. Any window of five consecutive hours can be used.
Expect zero weight loss in the first three weeks, which is the adjustment phase. You may even see weight gain during this period due to compensatory overeating. Weight measurement during this time is not recommended, but many people can’t resist, so don’t expect a loss. Three weeks after starting the Fast-5 program, you should see an average of a pound per week loss. That means over the course of four weeks, you should see four pounds lost, but the loss may not be evenly spread from week to week; it can be two pounds one week, none the next, then two again, and so on.
Some people see more rapid weight loss, even in the first three weeks. That’s not a problem, but may not be seen by everyone, and is less likely for someone who’s already been maintaining a low-carb diet. An early loss of several pounds early is likely to be mostly water, so if you see a large early loss, do not expect to see the same rate in later weeks.
There are two ways to start, “cold turkey” and a gradual “adjustment” approach.
1. Cold Turkey
In a cold turkey start, one simply chooses to not eat until the eating window opens. This approach is usually effective but may require a number of “close” days before finally reaching the target time. Using this approach, the third, fourth, fifth day is typically the hardest to get through, and after this “crunch” day, the days get easier quickly.
Key to remember: If you slip and don’t reach your goal, don’t give up. Getting close to your goal pushes your body to adapt, which can make it easier to reach your goal on your next try. Slips are a normal part of adjustment.
2. Adaptation
In the adaptation approach (extensively described in the book), the time one first eats (called break-fast and pronounced “brake-fast” to avoid confusion with breakfast) is gradually pushed back. The time of break-fast is pushed back by the same interval (half an hour or an hour) every day or every few days until it is the desired window opening time.
One can also adapt using the “ratchet” approach, in which you don’t eat until at least 15 minutes later than yesterday’s break-fast time, but if you’re not truly hungry at that time, you wait until you are. With this approach, you postpone break-fast by whatever time increment your body’s ready for. Some days break-fast may be 15 minutes later than the day before, and some days it may be an hour or more later, but it doesn’t fall back.
Key to remember: Same as the cold turkey approach: If you slip and don’t reach your goal, don’t give up. Getting close to your goal pushes your body to adapt, which can make it easier to reach your goal on your next try. Slips are a normal part of adjustment.
The Fast-5 way of eating works because it restores appetite to an appropriate level for the amount of stored energy (fat) you have and the amount of energy you expend in a day. You take in less food so your body burns more fat. Binge eating may occur during the adjustment phase of the program, but doesn’t typically persist.
Inches before pounds – Inches seem to disappear before the weight comes off. Probably due to fat redistribution, this means a Fast-5er typically will see loosening of belts or pants before the weight loss is seen on the scale.
Feeling cool or cold when they’d usually be comfortable – this occurs during the fasting period due to the absence of heat generated as a byproduct of digestion of the usual meals. Digestion is metabolic activity, but the energy burned by digesting food is less than the energy that gets stored, resulting in a net gain of calories and fat. While the absence of digestive heat may mean wearing an extra layer in cold weather, it also means greater comfort in warm or hot weather. After starting Fast-5, the heat byproduct of digestion may be more noticeable after break-fast because it hasn’t been going on constantly.
Decrease in symptoms of inflammatory and other diseases:
Fast-5ers have reported diminished symptoms of: rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma, congestive heart failure and a reduction of insulin requirement for type 2 diabetes.
Fewer meals, less food, and less time spent preparing meals means more time and money for you to spend as you wish.
Yes. Any five-hour window should work. The primary reason for having the window late in the day is to avoid having a time after the window is closed during which one must resist temptations (and limbic hunger) until going to sleep. For some, this presents no problem, while for others, it is a significant one. Fast-fivers have been successful with all sorts of windows, from morning to mid-day to evening.
Eating late in the day is not a good idea if you eat breakfast, lunch, and dinner, because it takes away the last opportunity your body has to reach a long interval of low insulin, as shown in the graph on page 49 of the book. Low insulin levels are good for burning fat rather than storing it. If you’re fasting 19 hours a day, it doesn’t matter whether you eat early or late – your body still gets the opportunity to burn fat.
I was losing weight steadily for a while, but now it hasn’t changed in the last few weeks. What can I do?
This time of holding steady is called a plateau. Your body has lost some weight, but isn’t willing to let go of more. The following techniques may help you break through the plateau. Once broken, weight is lost at about the same rate as before, and you may reach other plateaus before getting to your goal weight.
1. For a short time (two weeks or so) increase your exercise by 20% or more.
2. Consciously cut your calorie intake for about two weeks. Consistently cutting half a serving of one item in your meal can be enough.
3. Temporarily cut your window duration from five hours to two or three.
4. If you’re feeling up to it, extend your fast on one or more occasions by 12-24 hours.
5. Try a schedule holiday – a day or two off of the Fast-5 schedule, then return to your usual schedule.
People holding at a plateau weight using Fast-5 have reported having increased hunger just before the weight loss begins, so try to think of increasing hunger as a good thing.
Give yourself time to adjust. Compensatory overeating is a normal part of the adjustment, and typically subsides after a week, but sometimes it takes up to three weeks. Weight loss is not to be expected until you’ve been on a steady Fast-5 schedule for at least three weeks.
Yes. Fast-5 is designed to be as easy as possible and still work. If you find yourself comfortable with a five hour window and want to try a shorter one, or if a shorter window fits your schedule or preferences better than a five-hour window, shortening the window may improve the long-term benefits of Fast-5 by reducing the time that your insulin level is elevated above the fasting baseline.
Success with a sliding window is likely to vary from person to person and schedule to schedule. This is one of the many places where one should start with a fixed schedule, and after achieving a comfortable “steady state” of weight loss, make changes to tailor Fast-5 to schedule and preferences. If your weight loss stops, it’s easy to go back to what worked. If your weight loss continues, then you have found extra freedom in tailoring the program to your lifestyle.
Any beverage of zero or negligible calorie content is fine: water, flavored water, seltzer water, club soda, coffee, or tea. Decaf coffee is suggested in order to reduce the stimulant effects of caffeine. See the “Artificial Sweetener” question below for information on artificially sweetened beverages.
Decide what you think is the healthiest diet, much like any parent would choose for his/her kids if they would eat anything and everything offered.
A variety of fruits and vegetables with a generous amount of fiber
A variety of protein sources: fish, eggs, meat
Nuts or sunflower seeds.
A balance of carbohydrate, fats, and protein with no extremes. Reducing carbohydrates (bread, pasta, rice, potatoes, cereals) may enhance weight loss by an additional effect on appetite moderation.
Yes. Fast-5 can be combined with diet programs that specify content, such as a low-carb diet, an ADA diet for diabetics, etc.
Sugarless gums and candy often contain calories because they contain sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, so this would not be consistent with fasting. Chewing and/or the sweet taste, even without calorie content, may trigger gut activity and increase hunger. If it’s important to you to have gum, you can compare Fast-5 with gum and without gum for a couple of days each way and see if you notice any difference. For candy sweetened with artificial sweeteners, see the artificial sweeteners question.
Fast-5 is not a quick weight loss plan. It’s powerful, effective, and sustainable, but it’s not quick. A pound per week is the typical sustained average weight loss. In the tortoise-and-hare tradition, it is more likely to get you to your goal than a “quick” solution. For most people, a pound per week is much faster than the rate at which the excess weight was gained.
Artificial sweeteners are acceptable but should be minimized. Even though they’re artificial, they may trigger insulin release through taste receptors, which can lead to reduced fat burning. If their use helps with weight loss, then the overall health balance of good vs. bad favors using them, but it would be best to get used to drinking beverages without them.
Stevia is a natural non-caloric sweetener not approved as a food additive by the US FDA, so you won’t find it in any beverages. It is, however, available as a supplement in the USA and is widely used around the world. One should not conclude any product is safe simply because it is natural—the deadly toxins ricin and botulinum toxin are completely natural too. Recent toxicity studies have shown no significant threat in using stevia. When hundreds of millions of people have used it thousands of times, as they have with Nutrasweet and Splenda, hidden problems may become evident. Like the artificial sweeteners, the sweet taste may elicit some insulin response, so minimizing use would be a wise choice.
No problem. Not enough calories to have an effect.
Fast-5ers report that high carbohydrate (bread, rice, pasta, potatoes) intake usually lead to more hunger the following day. You may want to trim your carbs. Increased hunger may also mean you’re about to start dropping weight again after a plateau period.
If you ate everything you needed to in order to get all the nutrients you need to survive, wouldn’t you be extremely stuffed?
No — consider this: What do we need nutrients (food) for?
1) fuel – energy to supply bodily functions
2) structure – spare parts to replace what’s used
As for #2, the body is very, very good at recycling. When cells or parts of cells grow old, their parts are largely reused. For someone who is not growing, pregnant, or breast feeding, the need for these spare parts is tiny compared to our need for fuel.
For #1, fuel, yes we need fuel, but if it is stored on our bodies already as fat, then we don’t need to be eating fuel. For those wanting to lose weight, the idea is to “eat” the stored fuel — as Carrie of the Fast-5 Yahoo group put it, she wants her body to go “eat” her thigh.
There is a lot of exaggeration about how much nutrient intake we need to live. Much is due to marketing and some is planned in order to avoid vitamin deficiency. The US RDA, for example, was developed based on micronutrients, not total calories, when obesity wasn’t much of a problem. It used a 50% excess of content to make sure sufficient micronutrients (vitamins, etc.) are available in an “average” diet for the “average” person.
Many people have asked if they can eat various no-carb foods such as olive oil or protein shakes during the fasting period. Eating anything during the fasting period, even if it does not produce an insulin surge, may impair progress on Fast-5 because eating calorie of any sort may activate limbic hunger which instinctively prompts a person to eat more once the first bite is taken. Limbic hunger (p. 12 in the book) can be difficult to resist.
However, no two people are alike and what is a problem for others may not be a problem for you. What works for you is all that matters, so you can try any modification of Fast-5 you wish. If your modification works, you keep losing weight. If it doesn’t, you stop losing weight. You can always go back to what worked, and all you risk by trying something new is your rate of weight loss. Once you’re started on Fast-5 using the traditional style (no calorie intake during the fasting period) and see some steady weight loss, you know what works. After that, you can experiment and see what modifications work for you.
I see that alot of people here tried fast-5 or some other type of IF this summer and I’m wondering how you guys are doing now?
I started fast-5 on Wednesday, but I’m acclimating so I ate at 12. Then Thursday I ate at 2. By Friday I’d lost 2 lbs and felt that weird taste in my mouth that the pdf talked about. Overall, I’m super excited!!! The science seems so obvious, so real, true.
This last year has kicked my butt. I was gaining weight constantly, stress eating, and by March I was topping my most ever non-pregnant fat wieght at 183. We were running out of savings while my husband finished a three year project creating an rpg computer game, Depths of Peril, that just recently came out. I was freaking out about the money and about the unknown (not knowing what would happen when the game came out). Plus, I have alot of writing in the game and I didn’t know what that meant for me or my writing career. Besides stressing out about all of that, I was stressing about my weight spiralling higher, my spiking blood pressure (distolic over 90), and the serious heart burn resulting from too much advil (headaches due to blood pressure) ripping up my stomach.
By May, I was on Meridia (part weight loss, part anti-depressant), which I took for nine weeks. It really helped with the anxiety. I noticed right away that things weren’t making me tence up the way they used to. But for that luxury, I felt car sick anytime I shopped (groceries) or spent time on the computer. I lost eight pounds and gained back five when I went off the drug, but my weight steadied at 177.
I am thin at 140, so I need to lose 37 lbs. I’m extremely positive and excited about fast-5. It just makes sense! I’ve not been very hungry during the day. The biggest thing is psychological, the times I think I “should” be eating. But I’m stubborn as hell.
And when I’m not eating, I can’t stress eat.
I did weight watchers five years ago with my husband and lost 30 lbs. But after two years, it started creeping back. I tried ww several times after that, but I couldn’t stick to it. The result was that I yo-yoed myself up to new heights. It was very frustrating and depressing.
I really think fast-5 is exactly what I need — long term. I can’t wait to get my body, and more important these days, my health, back for good.
Delilah
—————————————
Hi Tom,
I’m having a little trouble with the navigation of your site, so I figured I’d just message you directly to thank you…!
The link on your website [for the Eat Stop Eat program] indirectly proved to be THE SOLUTION for me. I started research the Eat Stop Eat program and, in the process, I encountered a similar intermittent fasting program – and way of life: Fast-5 (http://www.fast-5.com/).
Granted, I’m only on Day 3 of the program; however, I’ve struggled long enough to know that this IS the solution for me. It’s the most amazing form of healing I’ve ever experienced. If it weren’t for your site, there’s not telling how long it would have taken me to discover this… (if ever).
Thanks so much!
-Amy (aka TheRisingStar456)
I was playing with my daughter the other day. She has this bear named Barry. I thought it would be funny to leave a note saying “We have Barry The Bear! Send $2 Million or the bear gets it!” It tickled me so much that I died laughing. Everything was going well except I wasn’t going to sit there cutting words out of magazines for an authentic note. Enter ransom notes for busy kidnappers. Just enter your ransom note and out pops a genuine looking ransom request good enough to fool Boulder Colorado Police! Check it out: